Social Counter


No bit of apparatus is more basic to summiting high tops than footwear. An extraordinary mountaineering boot fills endless jobs: it must offer help while conveying substantial burdens, hold unquestionably over smooth shake and day off, your feet warm when the mercury plunges, and take into consideration the connection of crampons and skis. Be that as it may, in particular, it must impart trust and certainty. Our picks for the best mountaineering boots of 2019 beneath are separated into three classifications: outrageous cold/high height boots for the world's tallest mountains, 4-season specialized snow capped boots for keeping your feet warm while moving quick and light, and lightweight mountaineering boots for less specialized and lower rise courses. For more foundation data, see our purchasing exhortation and examination table beneath the picks.

Best Overall Mountaineering Boot
1. La Sportiva Nepal Cube GTX ($599)
Class: 4-season specialized snow capped
Body configuration: Single calfskin
Weight per pair: 3 lbs. 15 oz.
Programmed crampon good: Yes
What we like: A profoundly flexible and amazingly agreeable boot that is lighter than contending models. Comes in the two people's estimating.
What we don't: Leather ingests water more promptly than manufactured boots, and weight investment funds come to the detriment of solidness.

La Sportiva's Nepal line has been the leading figure for specialized single mountaineering boots for about two decades. There have been a few cycles throughout the years, however the idea has stayed generally the equivalent: a solid calfskin boot that exceeds expectations over the range of mountaineering. These boots have kept aides' feet warm on Mount Rainer, are more than adequate for everything except the coldest long stretches of kicking up dry ice in the upper east, and ought to perform fine and dandy on late April and May outings to the lower tops in the Alaska Range. You can even break out a couple of shake moves when required gratitude to the elastic toe. What's more, La Sportiva raised the stakes on their Nepal line when they presented the Nepal Cube GTX.

The Cube GTX holds the exemplary Nepal EVO's detail and handyman ability, yet with a couple of remarkable contrasts. For one, we cherish the option of a removable tongue, which can be gone up or down (or even evacuated) to include cushioning or make more space. Besides, the Cube comes in at 8 ounces lighter for the pair, which—while unquestionably a reward over long trudges—brings about less toughness in the sole and padded sole. On the off chance that toughness or cost is your most significant thought, we would rather suggest the EVO ($510, 4 pounds 7.4 ounces) or Scarpa Mont Blanc Pro GTX underneath ($525, 4 pounds). Something else, the Nepal Cube GTX will give you the glow and bolster you need in a lighter bundle.

Best High-Altitude Mountaineering Boot
2. La Sportiva Olympus Mons ($999)
Category: Extreme cold/high altitude
Body design: Double synthetic
Weight per pair: 6 lbs. 3.7 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: A premium and time-tested high altitude boot that is like an oven for your feet.
What we don’t: Insulating Vibram PE sole is less durable than conventional rubber.

The La Sportiva Olympus Mons is perhaps the most popular double boot on the market for extreme cold. It’s the go-to model for mountaineers looking to stay warm in extreme places like Denali’s West Buttress, Mount Everest, and Antarctica’s Mount Vinson. The uber-comfortable polyurethane thermal-insulated inner boot accommodates a wide range of foot sizes, and the one-handed lacing system with a Velcro closure doesn’t require any tying (perfect for tightening with big gloves or even mittens). A similar system tightens up the outerboot before a durable zipper and Velcro strap seal off your feet from the frozen elements of the world’s biggest mountains.

The biggest downside of the La Sportiva Oly Mons is that it achieves a significant amount of underfoot warmth from the unique insulating Vibram PE sole. This is the softest rubber of any double boot on the market, so fragile that the boot is designed to be worn consistently with crampons. If you do a lot of walking on sharp rocks without crampons (think Aconcagua, for example), you will notice quicker wear on the boot. La Sportiva does address this issue by having a full-strength rubber toe, so for most snow and ice mountains like Denali, durability won’t be an issue. In addition, it’s no secret that the Oly Mons is a heavy boot—the heaviest on our list in fact—but many find the heft to be worth it for the extra bump in warmth. And in terms of fit, many people recommend going up at least one full size.
See the La Sportiva Olympus Mons

Most Comfortable Boot for Hiking and the Approach
3. Scarpa Charmoz ($325)
Scarpa Charmoz mountaineering bootCategory: Lightweight mountaineering
Body design: Single synthetic
Weight per pair: 3 lbs. 6.4 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: No
What we like: Great price point, rocker is suited for long approaches, lightweight, comes in both men’s and women’s models.
What we don’t: Not super durable or warm due to the lightweight fabrics.

The Scarpa Charmoz is a go-to option when you need one piece of footwear to get you from the car to the summit. From long approaches through tree line to crossing glacier-polished granite slabs and cramponing up icy summit pyramids, the Charmoz will keep your feet dry and agile. It is decidedly a three-season boot—the light insulation, quasi-flexible sole, and high rocker mean that the Charmoz is not an ideal choice for technical ice climbing or mountaineering in cold conditions. But for spring and fall weekend missions into the Cascades, Bugaboos, Rockies, or Sierra, it is an excellent boot.

At a little over 3 pounds for the pair, the Charmoz is slightly heavier than the La Sportiva Trango Cube GTX below but feels a little more durable. And at just $325, the Charmoz is $74 cheaper than the Trango Cube, although it does utilize an OutDry waterproof liner instead of a more proven Gore-Tex insert. As with many boots in this weight class, the lack of a toe welt means that the Charmoz will not take step-in crampons, although it is compatible with semi-automatic crampons. On a recent climbing trip to Nepal, our tester was very satisfied with how well the Charmoz hiked on trails and kicked up scree on a 5,200-meter pass. If covering miles and vertical versatility are what you are looking for, this is our favorite lightweight boot.
See the Men's Scarpa Charmoz  See the Women's Scarpa Charmoz

Best Mountaineering Boot for Technical Ice Climbing
4. Scarpa Phantom Tech ($825)
Scarpa Phantom Tech mountaineering bootCategory: 4-season technical alpine
Body design: Single synthetic w/gaiter
Weight per pair: 3 lbs. 11.2 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Great warmth-to-weight ratio, waterproof, highly technical.
What we don’t: One of the more expensive boots in its class.

Scarpa’s entire Phantom line looks so similar that it can be hard to tell the Tech apart from the 6000 and 8000. In sum, the Tech is the racecar of the Phantom line and one of the most popular boots among ice climbing guides. Given how light it is at just 3 pounds 11 ounces (the 2019 update saw a 12-percent drop in the boot’s weight), the Tech packs an astounding amount of warmth. And unlike the leather single boots in this round-up, which come up a little higher on the shin, this synthetic technical boot stops just above the ankle. This fit not only lightens it up, but also allows for more ankle articulation for precision placements on ice and mixed pitches.

Like the bigger boots in Scarpa’s Phantom line, the wrap-around zipper can take a little time to get used to, but once we did we really liked it. In terms of competitors, the Phantom Tech is similar to the Arc’teryx Acrux AR and La Sportiva G5 in warmth, weight, and features. The G5, however, does not have a waterproof zipper, which can make a big difference on approaches where you have to splash across creeks or on warm days when snow and ice takes on a wetter quality. Accordingly, Scarpa wisely put a waterproof zipper on every boot in their Phantom line. For a technical climbing boot that is warm, durable, and performs extremely well on steep terrain, the Phantom Tech is a great choice.
See the Scarpa Phantom Tech

Best of the Rest
5. Scarpa Phantom 6000 ($950)
Scarpa Phantom 6000 mountaineering bootCategory: 4-season technical alpine
Body design: Double synthetic
Weight per pair: 4 lbs. 6 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Simple but effective lacing system, watertight zipper, technical fit.
What we don’t: For those with narrow feet, the wider fit in the heel and toe box may reduce the boot’s technical prowess.

Of all the technical double boots on this list, the Scarpa Phantom 6000 offers the best performance, construction, and feel. This is Scarpa’s go-to model for giant ice routes in the Canadian Rockies and technical Alaska ascents, and we feel confident in saying that it’s also a great option for many mid-season Denali climbers (Scarpa’s Phantom 8000 is even warmer, but significantly heavier). At only 4 pounds 6 ounces for the pair (size 42), the Phantom 6000 is the lightest in its class—a hair lighter than the La Sportiva G2 SM, and more than 1 pound lighter than La Sportiva’s technical machine, the Spantik.

In terms of construction, a PrimaLoft Micropile insulated liner provides ample padding and warmth, with a basic Velcro closure on the outer side. Scarpa shaved weight from the previous orange Phantom 6000 by replacing the rubber rand with a molded foam rand, which likely will not be as durable in the long run. Further, the wrap-around zipper concept can feel weird at first, but we appreciate the fact that this design almost entirely protects the zipper from being scuffed by the passing point of a crampon. Lastly, this boot only comes in full sizes, and many might find the heel pocket to be noticeably broad. Although Scarpa’s footwear is known for being wider than La Sportiva’s, we felt that these boots fit very similar to the La Sportiva G2 SM.
See the Scarpa Phantom 6000

6. Arc’teryx Acrux AR ($750)
Mountaineering Boots (Arc'teryx Acrux AR GTX 2)Category: 4-season technical alpine
Body design: Double synthetic
Weight per pair: 4 lbs. 2 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Low-profile design for such a warm double boot.
What we don’t: Narrow design may not accommodate wide feet as well as other brands.

When Arc’teryx designs something, they typically go bold, and the Acrux AR mountaineering boot is no exception. Sleek and black with just a slight hint of red, the Acrux AR looks like it could kick a mountain to pieces and come away without a scratch—of all the options on this list, it may be the most durable. The Acrux AR has very few seams, which are known to be points of weakness in mountaineering boots. A fully waterproof zipper protects the Gore-Tex lined inner boot, which resembles a thick and stretchy sock. We were somewhat surprised by the simple lace design (a pull-down cinch design would be nice), but a lateral Velcro strap provides some additional stiffness above the ankle.

In terms of best uses, the Acrux AR will excel at everything from ice climbing in the Canadian Rockies to alpine-style ascents of lower mountains in the Alaska Range. Although Arc’teryx calls the Acrux AR a double boot, it’s less so than the Scarpa 6000 or La Sportiva Spantik. In fact, this boot is closer in warmth, weight, and technicality to the La Sportiva G5 and Scarpa Phantom Tech. We also found the Acrux AR has a narrower fit than the G5. Overall, if the Acrux AR fits your foot and price range, we feel confident that this stealth boot will propel you across wide glaciers, up steep drips, and onto many remote summits.
See the Arc'teryx Acrux AR

7. La Sportiva Trango Tech GTX ($269)
Mountaineering Boots (La Sportiva Trango Tech GTX)Category: Lightweight mountaineering
Body design: Single synthetic
Weight per pair: 2 lbs. 11.6 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: No
What we like: Exceptionally lightweight but still protective, waterproof, and able to accommodate a semi-automatic crampon.
What we don’t: Lacks durability and versatility; not built for all-day snow objectives.

New for 2019, La Sportiva’s Trango Tech is by far the lightest—and most affordable—mountaineering boot we feature. You won’t be wearing this boot for ice climbing or high-altitude mountaineering, but for many objectives in the Lower 48 it’s worth a close look. With a streamlined build and flexible sole, the Trango Tech is akin to an approach shoe or hiking boot. That said, its waterproof upper and heel welt make it surprisingly capable in steep snow. Put it all together, and Sportiva’s new hybrid offering is an ideal mix for fast-and-light objectives in regions like the Cascades or Patagonia, where a route might contain equal parts trail, snow, ice, and rock. In fact, the Tech all but replaces the Trango Cube GTX (below) as a summer mountaineering boot for ounce-counting alpinists.

We thought the Trango Tech made a perfect companion for climbing in Alaska’s Little Switzerland, where snow patches near the summits of rock routes required that we carry our boots along for the climb. Unfortunately, the boots do make compromises in terms of warmth, stability, and durability. Even in mid-summer on the glacier we suffered from cold feet from time to time, and on firm snow approaches we found ourselves wishing for more boot (for these two reasons, we don’t recommend the Tech for snow-dominant routes like Mount Rainier). Further, after just 10 days of use, our crampons and snowshoes had abraded patches on the outside of each boot (for a durable alternative, check out the La Sportiva Makalu below). But for the right setting, the Trango Tech fills a much-needed niche for the most weight-conscious of alpinists... Read in-depth review
See the Men's La Sportiva Trango Tech  See the Women's La Sportiva Trango Tech

8. La Sportiva Baruntse ($625)
La Sportiva Baruntse mountaineering bootCategory: 4-season technical alpine
Body design: Double synthetic
Weight per pair: 5 lbs. 9.4 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Great price point, fits a wide range of feet, warm.
What we don’t: More of a comfort fit than a performance fit—a little heavier than the ultra-technical and modern double boots on this list.

The Baruntse is the most durable double boot in La Sportiva’s lineup. Compared to ultra-modern double boots like the Scarpa Phantom 6000 and La Sportiva Spantik and G2 SM, the Baruntse doesn’t offer the shiny features and high-tech designs that win gear awards. Instead, it is constructed to take a beating on steep ice and cold mountains and still get the job done. And the boot may not be quite as warm as the aforementioned models, but it’s Alaska-tested and remains a favorite for technical ascents in the Ruth Gorge and high altitude sufferfests on Denali, Aconcagua, and beyond (if climbing early season on Denali, you may want to consider adding a Forty Below Purple Haze overboot for extra warmth).

At $625, the La Sportiva Baruntse is relatively inexpensive compared to other double boots. But for the price, you get beefy soles that can be resoled, rubber rands, stout crampon welts, and metallic gussets and eyelets, all of which should stand up to years of abuse. This does come at a weight penalty—the Baruntse is one of the heavier boots on this list at over 5.5 pounds. In terms of fit, the toe box of the liner is a little roomier than La Sportiva’s more typical rock-shoe-like fit, which is welcome news for those with wide feet (who might normally tend toward a Scarpa or Lowa). In addition, it’s worth noting that the 7mm thermo-moldable EVA foam liner allows for custom fitting. Some people retrofit this boot with a thicker and even warmer Intuition Denali or Logan liner, which takes up additional room and provides an incredible custom fit for your boot once heat molded.

9. Scarpa Phantom 8000 ($1,250)
Mountaineering Boots (Scarpa Phantom 8000)Category: Extreme cold/high altitude
Body design: Double synthetic
Weight per pair: 5 lbs. 12 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Excellent warmth-to-weight ratio, more durable sole than Oly Mons, easy to adjust with big gloves, wider than La Sportiva boots.
What we don’t: The most expensive mountaineering boot on the list.

The Phantom 8000 is the durable workhorse for extreme cold in Scarpa’s line. From the ground up, Scarpa designed a serious boot here: an insulated Schoeller upper shell keeps elements out of the boot, while a thermo-moldable liner with a simple pull-down speed lace keeps your foot tight and toasty. What’s more, the Vibram Zero Gravity Lite sole can stand up to the abuse of kicking up scree, unlike the La Sportiva Oly Mons (take this into account if you’re climbing a mountain like Aconcagua). And zippers are always a cause for concern—it only takes one misstep with sharp crampons to shred a zipper—but Scarpa’s method of putting them on the outside of the foot should help alleviate that issue.

Why the middle-of-the-pack ranking for the Scarpa Phantom 8000? Our decision here came down to price. When placed head-to-head with the comparable Sportiva Oly Mons, the Scarpa comes out in front in many categories: it boasts a more durable sole, a lighter weight, and a more generous toe box (great for swelling toes and wide feet). However, we’re just not sure that the cash is worth it. The boot will almost always be used with a crampon, and a 4-ounce weight savings (per half pair) is a small drop in the bucket considering that each boot is close to 3 pounds. In the end, we recommend you let fit be the main decider—when you’re high on an 8000-meter peak, you probably won’t be worrying about the extra $250.
See the Scarpa Phantom 8000

10. Lowa Mountain Expert GTX Evo ($420)
Mountaineering Boots (Lowa Mountain Expert GTX Evo)Category: Lightweight mountaineering
Body design: Single leather
Weight per pair: 3 lbs. 13.9 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Great all-around, super durable boot for everything from basic mountaineering to technical climbing.
What we don’t: Slightly less rocker than other lightweight boots.

The Lowa Mountain Expert GTX Evo could be considered a classic, and we don’t mean that in a negative way. Other boots in its class shed weight by using lighter materials, often at the expense of durability and a high price tag. New features and technological advances are great, but sometimes you just want something that is hard to kill and can get the job done. Without sporting features like built-in gaiters, fancy lacing systems, or ultralight foam rands and insulation, the Mountain Expert GTX Evo is an excellent do-all lightweight mountaineering boot that still manages to be gentle on your wallet.

Although the Lowa isn’t the absolute lightest of the fully step-in crampon-compatible single boots listed here, we feel that the benefits of durability, warmth, and a very reasonable price make it a nice choice for a wide range of activities from basic mountaineering to technical ice and mixed climbing. Not only can the Mountain Expert GTX Evo take a beating, but its stiffness underfoot—while still allowing for ankle articulation—makes it ideal for steep ice and precision footwork on hairy mixed leads. You do get slightly less rocker than other boots in the lightweight category—meaning the Mountain Expert is a bit less comfortable on the approach—but we like the price and performance overall.
See the Lowa Mountain Expert GTX Evo

11. La Sportiva G2 SM ($850)
La Sportiva G2 SM mountaineering bootCategory: 4-season technical alpine
Body design: Double synthetic
Weight per pair: 4 lbs. 8.2 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Very warm and comfortable, lighter than the Spantik.
What we don’t: Noticeably less stiff, less technical feeling, and less durable than the Spantik/Phantom 6000. The Boa system is hard to repair in the field.

The G2 SM was a radical shift in the lineup of La Sportiva double boots, shaving an impressive eight ounces per boot from the already light and technically charged Spantik (the G2 SM did not replace the Spantik, but was introduced several years later as an ultralight and even warmer alternative). La Sportiva went with a dual Boa lacing system (one on the ankle to secure the foot and another on the shin), which allows for quick tightening and adjustments without dealing with tying laces in the extreme cold. And the built-in super gator keeps your inner boot dry and toasty.

Compared to the Spantik, the G2 SM is warmer but not nearly as stiff or technical feeling. Even when tightened down, it has a lot more forward flex than the Spantik. This, along with a wider toe box, takes away from the precision fit needed for mixed climbing. And in terms of durability, the G2 SM seems to be slightly less durable than the Spantik or Scarpa Phantom 6000, though neither boot can match its light weight. Overall, the G2 SM excels at cold and high altitude mountaineering on 5,000 to 7,000-meter peaks and is still perfectly capable of climbing highly technical terrain. If weight savings and warmth are your main concerns, the G2 SM will not disappoint.
See the La Sportiva G2 SM

12. Scarpa Mont Blanc Pro GTX ($525)
Scarpa Mont Blanc Pro GTX mounatineering bootCategory: 4-season technical alpine
Body design: Single leather
Weight per pair: 4 lbs. 0 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Cheaper than its La Sportiva counterpart (the Nepal Cube GTX), lighter than older model, available in both men’s and women’s.
What we don’t: Lacing system does not come up as high on the shin as La Sportiva and Lowa models.

It comes as no surprise that the Mont Blanc Pro GTX is a go-to for guides on Mount Rainier. Like our top-ranked La Sportiva Nepal Cube GTX, the Scarpa is a jack-of-all-trades mountaineering boot. It walks well due to the medium rocker, climbs ice confidently thanks to the stiff upper and sole, and is warm enough to trust for all-season technical climbing and mountaineering. And for $74 less, the Scarpa is a steal—with one significant downfall: the Mont Blanc Pro’s lacing system lacks the clamp-down eyelet at the midpoint, which is a nice feature when you want to keep the lower foot tight but the ankle loose for walking. If you’re torn between the two, we’d recommend making your decision based on fit. And as with most of their boots, the Scarpa will be wider and the La Sportiva a bit more narrow.

Despite all of the features, it’s the durable design of the Mont Blanc Pro GTX that really drew us in. From the top down, the boot is constructed of burly fabrics with a minimized profile that doesn’t skimp on functionality. An elastic gator snaps shut with two buttons and stays tight around the calf, and a fixed adjustable inner tongue—somewhat similar to the removable tongue on the Nepal Cube GTX—can be moved up or down to obtain a comfortable fit based on the shape of your foot. Simply put, if the Mont Blanc Pro GTX fits, it will get you up summits and not fall apart on the way back down.
See the Men's Scarpa Mont Blanc  See the Women's Scarpa Mont Blanc

13. La Sportiva Spantik ($750)
La Sportiva Spantik mountaineering bootCategory: 4-season technical alpine
Body design: Double synthetic
Weight per pair: 5 lbs. 9 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Superbly technical feeling boot, easy lacing system, walks great on flat ground but stiffens up for technical climbing.
What we don’t: Not as durable as the Phantom 6000, and the liner takes a long time to dry compared to all-foam liners.

The Spantik was a revolutionary boot when it came out almost ten years ago, and it remains a favorite among technical alpinists and cold weather mountaineers. The boot has the feel of a technical single boot wrapped up in a super warm double design (it was created before zippers were really popular and instead has a wrap-around closure system on the outer shell). In terms of ability, these boots climb like a dream (for double boots, that is). Compared to the La Sportiva Baruntse or G2 SM, they have a precision fit, and the narrower toe box really allows you to feel your crampons as an extension of your toes. Furthermore, the one-hand lacing systems on both the inner and outer boot mean that you don’t even have to take off your mitten to batten down the hatches.

In terms of construction, the outer boot is composed of leather uppers and synthetic lowers. Soft foam on the midsole lowers weight and adds warmth, but also reduces durability in one key zone: the heel welt. Unfortunately, the 2mm plastic heel welt (where the crampon lever secures) is built onto this weak, soft foam foundation, and our tester actually had his completely break off while on a climbing trip in Alaska. That said, it’s worth noting that he loved the design of the Spantik enough to purchase a replacement pair.
See the La Sportiva Spantik

14. La Sportiva G5 Boot ($750)
La Sportiva G5 mountaineering bootCategory: 4-season technical alpine
Body design: Single synthetic w/ insulated gator
Weight per pair: 3 lbs. 12 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: A warm, versatile, and slightly cheaper alternative to the Scarpa Phantom Tech.
What we don’t: Less waterproof than Scarpa Tech boots, wider heel box than other Sportiva boots. Boa system is difficult to repair in the field.

When the La Sportiva Batura hit the market, it was instantly one of the most popular pieces of footwear for ice and technical alpine climbing. The G5 replaced the Batura 2.0 in 2017, shedding nearly 8 ounces from its predecessor, and is a highly technical boot that excels at steep ice and mixed climbing. The Nepal last provides stiffness and support with a Vibram Matterhorn sole for great traction in slick conditions. Like the G2 SM, the G5 uses the Boa lacing system to tighten the boot, and a Velcro strap cinches down above the ankle for additional stiffness. Ultimately, the La Sportiva G5 has a tremendous amount of dexterity and ankle articulation for precision placement while climbing.

The G5 undoubtedly is a technical machine and quite warm for its weight, thanks in large part to the insulated gaiter. But it does offer less upper ankle support than boots like the La Sportiva Nepal Cube GTX or Scarpa Mont Blanc Pro GTX, both of which extend higher above the ankle for more rigidity. That said, many technical climbers appreciate the additional ankle flex that is present in this lower profile (similar to the Scarpa Phantom Tech). And the La Sportiva G5 is a significant step up in warmth from the Trango Ice Cube GTX. Further, we don’t love the Boa lacing system (it’s difficult to repair in the field), and many testers find the heel pocket to be on the wide side. In terms of sizing, our tester found that (like the La Sportiva G2 SM) he had to drop down one-half size from his normal La Sportiva boot size to achieve a good fit.
See the La Sportiva G5 Boot

15. La Sportiva Trango Cube GTX ($399)
La Sportiva Trango Cube mountaineering bootCategory: Lightweight mountaineering
Body design: Single synthetic
Weight per pair: 3 lbs. 2 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: No
What we like: Great for long approaches and Lower 48 climbs.
What we don’t: Not incredibly warm, and the 3/4 shank not is meant for technical ice climbing.

The La Sportiva Trango Cube GTX—or “the little red boot” as it has often been called—has been a staple of low-altitude mountaineering for years. Like the Trango Tech above, the Cube can be thought of as a glorified hiking boot: it excels at thrashing through miles of backcountry trails, doubling as a rock shoe on low-fifth-class terrain, and then kicking up the final snow slopes to some Cascadian summit. The heel welt means you get semi-automatic crampon compatibility for ample stability during glacier travel, and a climbing zone on the toe offers great traction on rock. Taken together, it’s an ideal do-all boot for summer mountaineering in the lower 48.

However, we said it above and we’ll say it again here: the introduction of the Trango Tech could make the Trango Cube obsolete. Both boots have similar intentions and feature sets (waterproof upper, heel welt, climbing zone), but the Trango Cube comes in at 6.4 ounces (and $130) more for the pair. You will get slightly more durability and protection from the Cube, which is worth considering if weight is not your top concern. But even the Cube’s build is compromised when compared to more burly boots like the Nepal Cube or Scarpa Mont Blanc Pro. Finally, the Cube comes in two colors so hunters or hikers wanting an earthier tone can be a little less flashy than their climber brethren.
See the Men's La Sportiva Trango Cube  See the Women's La Sportiva Trango Cube

16. La Sportiva Makalu ($305)
La Sportiva Makalu mountaineering bootCategory: Lightweight mountaineering
Body design: Single leather
Weight per pair: 4 lbs. 5.1 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Classic design for general mountaineering, no frills, extremely durable, cheap.
What we don’t: Limited to basic mountaineering, heavier than similar boots.

The La Sportiva Makalu is the essence of a traditional mountaineering boot: it’s burly, supportive, and extremely durable. Neither flashy nor technical, this classic design works well for basic mountaineering and possibly as your first real boot. For example, the Makalu is a favorite for National Outdoor Leadership School students since it serves as a combination heavy backpacking and light mountaineering boot. It can trek the length of the Pacific Crest Trail and climb Mount Hood or Mount Saint Helens along the way.

Like the La Sportiva Trango Cube GTX, the Makalu is not meant for serious cold weather mountaineering, nor does it offer high-tech materials like Gore-Tex. But it is built to withstand years of abuse on scree slopes and in alpine environments. A Vibram toecap protects the front of the boot when kicking up rocky flanks, toe and heel welts accept step-in crampons, and a full shank provides support under a heavy pack. At $305, this boot still offers an impressive all-around feature set. You won’t be pushing the limits of technical climbing in the Makalu, but that isn’t its purpose.
See the La Sportiva Makalu

17. La Sportiva Trango Ice Cube GTX ($550)
La Sportiva Trango Ice Cube mountaineering bootCategory: 4-season technical alpine/lightweight mountaineering
Body design: Single synthetic
Weight per pair: 3 lbs. 3.3 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Highly technical boot in a lightweight package.
What we don’t: Plastic eyelets are prone to breaking, thin sole and narrow toe bail are lacking in toughness.

On paper, there is a lot to like about the La Sportiva Trango Ice Cube GTX, which is the latest iteration of the classic “Silver Bullet” Trango Extreme (and the insulated and gaitered sister of the Trango Cube GTX). Compared to the older model, the Ice Cube GTX is a lighter, Gore-Tex-lined precision boot with a lower profile and even more technical prowess. Despite all of this firepower, this boot tips the scales at just over 3 pounds, which is an incredible feat. This makes the Ice Cube GTX a popular choice for technical alpine routes on coarse granite in places like the Cascades, Rockies, and Patagonia. And if you only plan to use this boot with crampons on snow or ice, it also handles the alpine exceptionally well.

The Achilles Heel of the La Sportiva Trango Ice Cube GTX is durability. Our tester trusted his old Trango Extremes to summit Fitz Roy in Patagonia, climb grade 6 waterfalls in Canada, and stay warm on overnight technical ascents in Alaska. He recently put the Ice Cube GTX to the test on Nemesis, a classic Canadian Rockies WI6 ice climb, and although they climbed even better than the Trango Extremes, they were not quite as warm and their lifespan fell tragically short. The gaiter felt like a shoddy afterthought, making entry into the boot awkward. The thin sole and toe welt showed wear and the fixed gator zipper broke after one short trip. And on top of that, La Sportiva substituted plastic shoelace hooks for the previous metal. We want to like the Ice Cube GTX, but these durability concerns are unacceptable for a $550 boot, no matter how light. Until La Sportiva makes some improvements, we recommend considering a boot like the Scarpa Rebel Pro GTX instead.
See the La Sportiva Trango Ice Cube GTX

18. Scarpa Inverno ($399)
Scarpa Inverno mountaineering bootCategory: 4-season technical alpine
Body design: Double synthetic
Weight per pair: 5 lbs. 8 oz.
Automatic crampon compatible: Yes
What we like: Cheap, nearly indestructible, and time-tested in cold environments.
What we don’t: Clunky and not nearly as technically capable as the sleek modern double boots above. The stock liner takes a long time to dry.

If the Scarpa Phantom Tech is the racecar of double boots, the Inverno is the tank. Plastic double boots largely have fallen out of favor over the last five years, but you can’t beat them for durability—your feet will wear out before the boot does. The Inverno is far less technical in nature than an option like the Spantik or Phantom series, but it will outlast them all. That, and there’s little chance the plastic shell will let moisture seep in.

If you plan to use this boot for a cold weather mountain like Denali, we highly recommend that you splurge for the warmer and lighter Intuition liner (keep in mind that this is best done at a specialized mountaineering shop, but many shops will only custom fit boots that were purchased at their store). It’s also highly recommended that you add a Forty Below Purple Haze neoprene overboot if climbing a cold mountain like Denali. When these two aftermarket features are added, the cost-benefit analysis between this system and a boot like the La Sportiva Baruntse above becomes a little less discernable. Regardless, if you aren’t planning on spending much time at freezing altitude or are on a tight budget, the Inverno may be the boot for you.

Mountaineering Boot Buying Advice
Mountaineering Boot Categories
Double Boots vs. Single Boots
Shell Materials: Synthetics and Leather vs. Plastic
Weight and Size
Liner Construction
Stiffness: Upper and Sole
Crampon Compatibility
Ski Compatibility
Mountaineering Boot Fit and Sizing
Women’s-Specific Boots

Mountaineering Boot Categories
Extreme Cold/High Altitude
Mountains come in all shapes, sizes, and levels of technical difficulty, therefore it’s imperative that your footwear is best suited for the conditions. For the highest and coldest mountains in the world—7,000 and 8,000-meter Himalayan peaks, Denali, and Antarctica—warmth is the utmost consideration. Extreme cold/high altitude boots are heavy, warm, and commonly take the form of double or even triple boots (with a shell, liner, and fixed gaiter). Some, like the La Sportiva Olympus Mons, even have an insulated sole that adds warmth on the underside of your foot.
Mountaineering (cliffs and snow)
The harshest mountain conditions demand a correspondingly serious boot

4-Season Technical Alpine
For giant ice routes in the Canadian Rockies, alpine-style ascents of lower mountains in the Alaska Range, and even mid-season climbs of Denali, a 4-season technical alpine boot may be your best bet. These boots are made in both double and single varieties, with the commonality being that they sacrifice the highest levels of warmth for technical prowess (they can handle the cold, just not extreme cold). Leading models in this category include the Scarpa Phantom 6000 and Arc’teryx Acrux AR.

Lightweight Mountaineering
For lower elevation climbs and more moderate temperatures, lightweight boots should do the trick. These boots are a technical step up in construction from a hiking boot and built to handle long approaches. Lightweight single boots are commonly used for trips such as Cascade peaks and volcanoes or a car-to-summit adventure starting below treeline and ending with basic to moderate mountaineering. Most are three-season boots with light insulation, a quasi-flexible sole, and high rocker, which means that they are not an ideal choice for technical ice climbing or frigid conditions. Popular lightweight mountaineering boots include models like the Scarpa Charmoz and La Sportiva Trango Tech GTX.
Lightweight mountaineering boot
In milder weather and at lower elevation, a lighter model is a fine option

Double Boots vs. Single Boots
Nothing is more frustrating or potentially dangerous than cold feet, and toes can go from cold to numb to frostbitten in a matter of minutes. That is why it’s imperative to have the proper boot design for your objective. Single boots lack a removable liner and therefore are the lightest and least warm type of mountaineering footwear. Double boots, on the other hand, have more insulation along with a removable liner, making them warmer and better suited for multi-day trips. The ability to remove the liner and dry it out at night is imperative on big mountains—nothing is worse than shoving your feet into frozen boots in the frigid, pre-dawn darkness of an alpine start.

Scarpa Phantom Tech
Climbing in the Scarpa Phantom Tech
For spring and summer ascents in lower altitude ranges like the Cascades or Canadian Rockies, a single boot should provide enough warmth. It will be light enough to wear on a lengthy approach, but offer enough support to keep your feet comfortable under the weight of a heavy pack. Single boots almost always have more of a next-to-skin feel, meaning they feel more technical and lower profile than their double-walled brethren.

Double boots are built for cold weather, multi-day expeditions, and climbing the world’s highest peaks. They often are significantly heavier than single boots and less sensitive overall, but some models like the Scarpa Phantom 6000 and La Sportiva Spantik offer a nice combination of the two (reasonably lightweight boots with technical features). For the tallest peaks and coldest climates—think places like the high Himalaya, Antarctica, and Denali—look toward the top of each brand’s collection. The La Sportiva Olympus Mons and Scarpa Phantom 8000, for example, are built specifically for these types of places.

Boot selection is not always a cut and dry choice, as some routes skirt the line between single and double. One of our testers recently spent the Austral Summer in Patagonia climbing outside of El Chaltén. He attempted Cerro Torre in single boots but found that weren’t adequate for the icy flanks of that impressive tower. They were, however, completely sufficient on his ascent of the nearby Fitz Roy a few weeks later, and offered more of the streamlined build and rock prowess that he needed. If it’s a toss-up, we do recommend erring on the side of warmth—being cold on big climbs can be uncomfortable at best and get dangerous in a hurry.

Shell Materials: Synthetics and Leather vs. Plastic
The shell is your first line of defense against the harsh conditions of a mountain environment. It needs to be durable (able to stand up to abrasion from rocks, crampons, and skis), and also must keep out snow, water, and mountain grit. In addition, a lot of a boot’s stiffness comes from the shell, which is important when it’s time to ice climb or do a little survival skiing on the way down. The vast majority of boot shells are now entirely synthetic or a combination of synthetics and leather. If they are made entirely of leather (such as the La Sportiva Nepal Cube GTX or Scarpa Mont Blanc Pro GTX), adding an aftermarket snow and water seal will help to keep moisture from entering into the boot.
Mountaineering Boots (synthetic Trango Tech)
La Sportiva's Trango Tech GTX has a synthetic upper

Ten years ago, plastic boots were a popular way to go. Compared to soft leather or synthetics, plastic feels more clunky and less precise when technical footwork is needed. But it does have its benefits: not only is plastic significantly cheaper, it’s also much more durable. If you are an occasional mountaineer on a budget or only intend to climb a few mountains, plastic may be a good option. Adding a Denali Intuition liner ($176 plus potential custom molding fees) will make them warmer while dropping almost a pound of weight in the process. For big mountains like Denali, a Forty Below Purple Haze overboot ($180) will be necessary as well, which may require that you purchase a different crampon to fit over the boot.

In 2019, however, you will see very few plastic boots on mountains like Denali or any of the popular Himalayan peaks. Synthetic boots weigh less, cinch down tighter, and have enough bells and whistles that they have rendered plastic boots almost obsolete. And if you customize your plastic boot as described above, it will end up costing between $700 and 750, which is roughly the price of a high-end synthetic double boot of equal warmth and superior technical precision.
La Sportiva Spantik (basecamp)
Getting comfortable at basecamp in the synthetic La Sportiva Spantik boots

Weight and Size
Big mountains require big boots, often with a big price tag. Some of the extreme cold/high altitude models on the list like the La Sportiva Olympus Mons are over 6 pounds for the pair and take up a decent chunk of your duffel bag. On the other end of the spectrum, you can go with a lightweight single boot like the La Sportiva Trango Tech GTX for just 2 pounds 11.6 ounces total. To be sure, it’s harder to move fast with more weight, but serious mountaineering typically does not involve highly technical climbing for extended stretches. It’s more steep walking and basic ice/rock moves, so shaving ounces is not as important as warmth. If your aim is technical climbing—pitch after pitch of near vertical climbing—size and weight will likely be a deciding factor in your boot purchase.

The good news is that high-end mountaineering boots have cut excessive frills, and although still heavy and bulky, are lighter than even a decade ago. A few ounces or grams may not seem like a big deal, but imagine post-holing through steep snow for 20,000 steps. To quantify this comparison, a 1-ounce difference in boot weight means that each leg will lift an additional 1,250 pounds during that time. The old adage that “ounces makes pounds and pounds are heavy” is especially true in regard to your feet.
Scarpa Charmoz mountaineering boot
The lightweight Scarpa Charmoz ready to be packed up

The only thing worse than losing feeling in your toes is the shooting pain that comes when they warm up. Selecting a boot that will keep your feet warm during the coldest conditions you will encounter is key. Double boots like the La Sportiva Olympus Mons and Scarpa Phantom 8000 are the warmest on the market and will protect your feet on the world’s highest mountains. At the same time, these boots will be overkill at the Ouray Ice Park (but still may work if that’s the only boot you have). On the other hand, Scarpa’s Phantom Tech or Lowa’s Mountain Expert GTX Evo will excel at climbing ice at moderate temperatures but are not meant for extremely cold weather.

The truth is, if you plan to do a wide range of climbing from cold and high-altitude peaks to technical summer scrambling, you ultimately will want to invest in at least two pair of boots. The difference is tremendous between double or triple boots built for 8,000-meter peaks and lightweight models that essentially are beefed-up hikers. All have their purposes—and some do a pretty good job at doing it all—but like many types of outdoor gear, having a quiver of options is ideal.
Ice climbing (Scarpa Phantom Tech)
It's always a good idea to play it safe in terms of boot warmth

Liner Construction
Depending on the double boot (remember that single boots don’t have removable liners), liners may provide a significant portion of a boot’s warmth and support. This is the part of the boot that you will want to remove at night during a multi-day trip, and the ability to dry the liner by stuffing it into your jacket or sleeping bag is imperative. Heavy, thick liners made of water absorbing materials will not dry completely throughout an alpine evening, which is why most modern boot liners are constructed of hydrophobic materials like closed-cell foam.

Single boots are built with an insulated and often waterproof liner. The most common design by far is a Gore-Tex bootie, although some Scarpa models include an OutDry membrane that is bonded directly to the upper material of the boot. Both designs will allow some breathability, but not nearly as much as a boot without a waterproof liner.

Stiffness: Upper and Sole
Ice Climbing Canadian Rockies (Lowa)
Technical ice climbing requires a stiff boot
In some ways, mountaineering boots need to do their best impersonation of a “quiver of one” type of footwear. In addition to the warmth and protection they provide, they need to be part rock shoe, part hiking boot, and even maybe an occasional ski boot. Having the ability to tighten the boot down when ice climbing or skiing and then loosening it when hiking is essential. Mountaineering boots don’t have lock-down modes like backcountry ski boots, but many now feature an upper and lower lacing system to isolate tightness to specific parts of the boot.

Sole stiffness, or stiffness underfoot, also is an important factor to consider—different types of climbing require varying sole stiffness. For low-altitude mountaineering where you won’t be technical ice climbing, you may want a boot with a ¾ shank sole (one that has some flex). These boots will feel like a stiff hiking boot and are better suited for long approaches, technical scrambling, or lower fifth-class rock climbing (like the Cascade’s classic Torment-Forbidden Traverse, for example). On the other size of the spectrum, full shank soles (with no flex) are optimal for technical ice climbing and advanced mountaineering with a step-in/automatic crampon.

Lacing Systems
Tightening your boots down doesn’t just involve basic laces anymore. Modern boots have a wide array of tightening systems including standard tie laces, pull-down cinch laces, or even the high-tech Boa lacing system. Many companies have moved away from standard laces because they are hard to tie and untie in extreme weather. In addition, having the ability to easily tighten or loosen your boots (maybe with only one hand) while wearing thick gloves or mittens is critical. Lacing systems should be simple, but efficient. The Boa system is probably the easiest to use, but it may be the most susceptible to breaking in an alpine environment. Luckily, Boa sells repair kits for very cheap and they can be reinstalled in about the same amount of time as it would take to replace a shoelace.

Crampon Compatibility
Automatic (Step-In) Crampons
For each boot, we’ve specified whether or not it is compatible with an automatic crampon. An automatic crampon—also known as a step-in crampon—uses a wire toe bail and heel clip to provide the most secure attachment, ideal for ice climbing or technical mountaineering. If we’re climbing anything that is remotely approaching vertical, we want an automatic crampon. In order to be compatible with this style of crampon, a boot must have toe and heel welts and a fairly stiff build that provides a stable structure for the crampon. Every double boot on this list is compatible with an automatic crampon.

Self-loader (Hybrid) Crampons

Increasingly adaptable, streamlined single boots frequently swear off the toe welt and generally shave weight by having a more slender last. Most of these models, for example, the La Sportiva Trango Cube GTX—still have a heel welt, which is basic for similarity with a self-loader crampon (otherwise called a half and half crampon). A self-loader crampon joins the front plastic circle of a lash on crampon (see beneath) and the heel clasp of a stage in crampon. While less secure than a stage in crampon, self-loader crampons are an obviously better decision for lightweight or adaptable boots as they have a greater amount of a capacity to move with the boot.

La Sportiva Trango Ice Cube (crampons)

Utilizing cross breed crampons with the La Sportiva Trango Ice Cube boots

Tie On Crampons

The last kind of crampon is a full tie on crampon (plastic circles in front and back with webbing to fix). Lash on crampons are profoundly versatile, and even are fit for fitting on lightweight methodology shoes. They do have constrained specialized execution, be that as it may, as they don't verify as firmly to the boot as a stage in or self-loader crampon. Tie on crampons can be appended to any kind of boot, despite the fact that they would have very traded off usefulness when combined with a solid form, and are not proper for ice ascending or specialized mountaineering. The exercise here is: ensure your boot can oblige the kind of crampon you need, and remember to check similarity and fit before any enormous excursion.

Ski Compatibility

On the off chance that you ever plan on ascending a mountain like Denali where you may utilize your mountaineering boots with skis (using ties, for example, the Silvretta 500), it's fundamental that your boot have both a heel and toe welt. These are the level rails on the front and back of the boot that fill in as the association point for crampons and a couple of sorts of ski mountaineering ties. Each full shank mountaineering boot right now available has this component.

Mountaineering Boot Fit and Sizing

Various organizations utilize various goes on for their mountaineering boots. Some will in general be marginally smaller (La Sportiva and Arc'teryx) while others routinely have a somewhat boxier feel (Scarpa). Because you wear a size 44.5 road shoe, doesn't imply that it will make an interpretation of legitimately into a major mountaineering boot. You might be a 44.5 in La Sportiva, a 44 in Scarpa and a 45 with a thick insole in Arc'teryx, for instance. Also, every boot has a special fit and it can take some work to dial it in. Continuously take a stab at your boots certainly before an excursion—some additional heel room rapidly can form into a show-halting rankle that shields you from arriving at the summit. Or then again a tight toe box can confine blood stream and lead to frostbite. Your feet swell as you remain on them, so we suggest giving boots a shot toward the evening after you have been strolling around for a couple of hours.

Mountaineering includes long days (regularly consecutive for up to seven days) conveying substantial packs and utilizing your feet in unique manners. In like manner, an insole is the main line of help in your boot. Custom boot fitters will say, "In the event that you purchase a $1,000 boot, discard the $0.10 insole." Often that is valid, despite the fact that organizations like La Sportiva and Scarpa appear to have observed. A considerable lot of their boots presently accompany quality insoles that offer help and solace, however a touch of extra warmth too. A decent insole should bolster your foot, both as far as supporting your curve and measuring your impact point.

In the event that the included insole doesn't work for you, consider spending another $40 to 50 for a warmth formed insole from a legitimate brand like Sole or Superfeet. Beside giving extra warmth, these insoles arrive in an assortment of thicknesses that can occupy room if there is excessively a lot of room (or even work out difficult situations). Also, when making a boot buy, it's in every case better to go marginally greater instead of going excessively tight—it's simpler to occupy space than to make it.

Women's-Specific Boots

Likewise with different kinds in ascending footwear, the most significant thing in picking a mountaineering boot is fit. The greater part of the models recorded above in fact are unisex, while a couple of like the La Sportiva Nepal Cube GTX, Scarpa Charmoz, and Scarpa Mont Blanc Pro GTX additionally come in women's-explicit variants. It's very normal for ladies to wear unisex boots—once more, it's about fit and just a bunch of models are even accessible in ladies' forms. It's likewise significant that La Sportiva and Arc'teryx will in general run tight, which—from a certain perspective—ought to be increasingly much the same as the state of a women's-explicit plan.


There's a familiar maxim in the open air gear world: "between light, sturdy, and modest, you can pick two of the three." Over the most recent decade or something like that, mountaineering boots have seen a colossal hop in exactness and specialized plan, while likewise cutting some weight. Sadly, this has come to the detriment of sturdiness somewhat. Plastic boots were practically indestructible, however they could feel fairly inconvenient simultaneously. New-age twofold boots like the Scarpa Phantom arrangement or La Sportiva Spantik are specialized climbing machines with shake shoe-like exactness and an elevated level of warmth. This is achieved by utilizing ultralight polyurethanes, froth, and manufactured textures, however these materials are considerably less solid than the plastic boots of old.

One of our Alaska analyzers has discovered that his high height specialized twofold boots last him around three years (however he midpoints 60 days of damaging use every year). Is the tradeoff of less toughness and a more significant expense for lower weight and greater detail justified, despite all the trouble? We suspect as much. The normal hiker will get numerous long stretches of utilization out of their boots. On the off chance that you basically live in your boots, you will welcome the more noteworthy adaptability, specialized ability, and lower weight. Also, for the individuals who prize toughness regardless of anything else, there's constantly a believed work steed and plastic twofold boot like the Scarpa Inverno.

Post a Comment